In the given example, the original argument:
"No, the employee's free time will be spent cleaning their homes, running errands, and visiting friends. The company will not benefit from this."
is simplified to:
"No, allowing employees to have free time will not be beneficial to the company"
This revision effectively strips away the extraneous details about how employees might use their free time. By doing so, it becomes clearer that the core of the argument is focused on the lack of direct benefits to the company from employee free time.
The fluff, which in this case includes specific examples of activities employees might engage in, is removed to highlight the main point more directly.